You are here: Home > Tools > Campaigning Insights > Research > 2006 UK MP Survey

2006 UK MP Survey

In April 2006, FairSay conducted a survey of UK MPs to clarify if and how eCampaigning influences them. These results demonstrate the diversity among MPs and the recommendations based on the findings.

Objectives

The primary questions driving the 2006 MP eCampaigning Survey wereto identify:

  1. If e-campaigning has an impact on UK MPs
  2. How it has an impact on UK MPs
  3. What strategy and tactics campaigning organisations should use to influence UK MPs

Findings

Campaigns using an over-simplistic campaigning approach that prescribes how communication should occur for all MPs is doomed to be effective for only some MPs

The survey identified that it is highly dependent on the MP as to how constituents communicate with them, how they treat different channels of communication and what impression different styles of communications leave. A major influence on these factors is also what the MPs current position is on the issue raised in the communication. Thus an over simplistic campaigning approach that prescribes how communication should occur for all MPs is doomed to only be effective for a proportion of MPs, likely no more than 50%.

Recommendations

A one-size-fits-all strategy for influencing MPs is more likely to fail. MPs positions and preferences should be researched, grouped and targeted appropriately.

Several strategies and tactics were identified that campaigning organisations can use to increase the impact of their online campaigning.  Foremost of these is that MPs vary considerably in how they perceive e-campaigning and thus having a one-size-fits-all approach is likely to work well with some MPs and not with others no matter what the strategy.  Instead MPs should be researched and segmented for more specific targeting according to a range of factors.

Some organisations may already do this offline to with MPs and Regional Assembly members. But online, most organisations target all MPs with the same message. Instead they should target segments of MPs and regional assembly members to distinguish the campaign from all the other issues and organisations MPs and regional assembly members are bombarded by.

Document Actions
Acknowledgements

The 2009 eCampaigning Review produced with the support of:

  • Engaging Networks
    Engaging Networks is a leading provider of eCampaigning software and services. Over 70 organisations use our e-activist 3.0 technology to run their local, national, and global campaigns. Engaging Networks is pleased to support the development of this resource to help spread new ideas within the global eCampaigning community.
  • FairSay
    FairSay provides advice and support on campaigning - especially eCampaigning. FairSay organises the annual eCampaigning Forum and provides eCampaigning training. It initiated this Campaigning Insights projects so those who cannot attend the eCampaigning Forum event can still benefit from it and can gain insight into eCampaigning.

Research Team

  • Jess Day: Qualitative analysis on the eCampaigning Practices survey and the eAction Review
  • Duane Raymond (of FairSay): Quantitative analysis on the eCampaigning Performance Benchmarks